We Are Women, Hear Us Roar

Should there be any doubt now that women can handle presidential debates, as well as men?  That they can conduct a live television event that lasts for 90 minutes before an audience of 60 million viewers?  That they can be smart, bold and professional in dealing with the men who would be president and vice president of this great nation?

No.  There should be no doubt at all.  CNN’s Candy Crowley and ABC’s Martha Raddatz have finally banished that old false notion that “men are better” to the R-I-P grave it deserves.

Of course, after former PBS anchor Jim Lehrer lost control of the first presidential debate in Denver, Raddatz and Crowleywere masterful in comparison.  Lehrer, the journalist who was moderating his 12th presidential debate, at times threw up his hands in exasperation as President Obama–but mostly Governor Mitt Romney–ignored the guidelines on time limits for statements and rebuttals.  The testy rivals literally wrested the debate away from Lehrer and he was pretty much reduced to the role of a potted plant.

Raddatz then moderated the vice presidential debate where she had been forewarned that Vice President Joe Biden might engage in some “funny stuff.”  Biden found Paul Ryan funny and he found himself funny, but under the firm hand of Raddatz, both men did as they were directed.  The vice presidential debate was not only enlightening but also enjoyable.

Poor Candy Crowley.  She had to moderate the second debate in the town hall format, which became the most contentious presidential matchup in recent memory.  There she was with a nervous audience of 80 undecided voters and two men who can’t stand each other.  Obama and Romney could not be more different: in family history, socioeconomic upbringing, political ideology, social status, and of course, color.  The only thing they have in common is Harvard Law School and nice families.

Obama blew the first debate by appearing disengaged and bored with the whole process. Romney, with an energetic and aggressive style won the debate “by a mile.”

The President was determined to change the public’s perception of him by changing his style, his answers, and his enthusiasm for the second debate.  Romney was ready for the Obama makeover.  Candy Crowley was ready for both of them.

I wouldn’t have traded places with her for anything.  The candidates entered the arena; yes that’s what the debate floor became.  The two men were already seething despite the plastered smiles and phony handshake.

This was supposed to be a debate dominated by questions from the undecided voters, but it quickly deteriorated into something that looked like a cockfight.

Throughout the debate Candy was juggling so many balls in the air:  listening to the producer in her ear; calling on audience members; watching the time; asking follow up questions; paying attention to the candidates’ answers; deciding who had the next question or rebuttal.

She was doing all this with an up-close and too personal display of male bravado.  I was waiting for one of the candidates to beat his chest or jump on the other’s back.  It was that nasty.

Candy, with the utmost politeness, struggled to remain in control despite being insulted by Governor Romney.  Did she retreat like a shy violet or burst into tears?  Not her.  She prevailed.

Candy raised two sons.  I have to believe that she harkened back to those days when her boys misbehaved and she had to discipline them.  Now before her eyes were the President of theUnited Statesand the former Governor of Massachusetts circling each other defiantly like naughty boys.  She finally said, with all the power she could muster in her voice, “Mr. Romney, sit down.”  And he did.

In 2016, the Commission on Presidential Debates should not hesitate to seek out women to be moderators. Candy Crowley and Martha Raddatz have proved that the best women can stand on equal footing with the best men.  Thank you, ladies.

Michelle and Sarah? Spare Me.

So, we have two women in the Republican Party who have designs on the highest office in the land.  I must admit I favored Hillary Clinton in the last presidential election.  I have been waiting for the day a woman would become President of the United States.  But could I vote for a Michelle Bachmann or a Sarah Palin?  Duh.  No.

Are these the most qualified women the Republicans can put forward?  I don’t think even the Party believes that.  There are some women and then there are some other women.  Where are the other women?  You know, the smart ones?

Bachmann and Palin seem to have good credentials when you read their bios.  Both held elective office.  They broke barriers for women.  They are wives and mothers.  They had careers before entering politics.

And for those that care, they are physically attractive and telegenic, so important in today’s TV-dominated political campaigns.

But then Michelle and Sarah speak.  Out of the mouths of these “babes” come some of the most uninformed statements and backward political policy positions you hear from the radical right wing.

They are “card-carrying” members of the Tea Party Movement.  Tea Partiers were protesting on the Capitol steps and spat on Missouri Rep. Emanuel Cleaver and shouted “nigger” again and again at civil rights icon, Georgia Rep. John Lewis.  I did not hear Bachmann or Palin denounce the vile behavior.

I am really talking about their comments that are just laughable. Could Michelle Bachmann be this dumb?

Bachmann:  “The Founding Fathers worked tirelessly until slavery was no more.” She is wrong and nearly 150 years off for when slavery really ended in the U.S.

Bachmann:  Speaking in New Hampshire, the first primary state.  “You’re the state where the shot was heard around the world in Lexington and Concord.” No, Michelle, that would be Massachusetts.

Bachmann:  Told Minnesotans she wanted them “armed and dangerous” to fight an energy tax, which would reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

She doesn’t know U.S. history and doesn’t believe scientific evidence and she thinks she can be President?

Sarah Palin has so many crazy quotations it was difficult to pick a few.

Palin:  Talking about Paul Revere after taking a tour of his home.  “He, who, warned, uh, the British that they weren’t gonna be takin’ away our arms, uh, by ringing those bells and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells…” Blah, blah.  What is going on in her head?  (I won’t answer that.)

Palin:  At a motorcyle rally in Washington, DC, while riding a Harley.  “I love the smell of emissions.”

Palin:  About NATO bombing in Libya.  “Do we use war?  Do we use squirmish?  What is it?” That statement should make many people squirm.

While both Representative Bachmann and former Governor Palin are wildly popular with some Americans, I don’t get it.  They are embarrassing to the nation and especially to women.

I wish they’d quietly leave the political stage before doing damage to women who are really qualified to be President of the United States.